成器之道——先秦工艺造物思想研究

he later as an example, that idea is put forward in Chou-Yi as an explanation for the origin of artificial objects. And the corresponding interpretation made in the dissertation has revealed that Guan-Xiang as a special kind of thinking is in fact a special grasp and understanding of the ring of design within the chain of ware-making . It is discussed further that this kind of thinking can account for the combination of simulation and symbolization as an out-standing feature in Chinese ware-making tradition. Specially, a separate section Thinking and Making is arranged to clarify the signification of the pre-Ch’in concepts of Zhi and Qiao. An interesting comparison is made here of the per-Ch’in concepts with those of ancient Greek, which serves to show that either ware-making activity or its concept is affected by general culture, and passivity and obedience is most essential to Chinese original attitude towards ware-making activity.

In the following two chapters, an interpretative read is made to related arguments in the pre-Ch’in classic writings in order to come off the profound thoughts about design evaluation and formal aesthetics. Take the part about formal aesthetic thoughts for example, there gives detailed interpretation about the ideas of pre-Ch’in thinkers. There contains Li-Yong-Ze-Zhi (Form should be defined by function) fro

上一页  [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] 下一页